NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Altamirano

 

DATE TYPED:

03/20/03

 

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE:

Purchase of PERA Service Credit

 

SB

378/aSFC/aSFl#1

 

 

ANALYST:

Gilbert

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

FY03

FY04

 

 

 

 

 

$0.1 See Narrative

Recurring

PERA

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC Files

 

Response Received From

Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)

State Personnel Office (SPO)

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of SFl Amendment

 

Senate Floor Amendment #1 to Senate Bill 378 amends the Public Employees Retirement Act to significantly reduce the total purchase cost of state legislator coverage plan service credit.

 

Currently, the purchase cost for each year of credited service to be used under a state legislator coverage plan is equal to the sum of the member contribution and an employer contribution of ten times the annual amount of pension per year of credited service under the state legislator coverage plan applicable to the member. Thus, each year of purchased legislator service credit currently costs $2,600.

 

Under this amendment the purchase cost would be equal to three times the normal member contribution per year of credited service under the state legislator coverage plan applicable to the member. Therefore, a legislative member could purchase a year of service credit for only $300.

 

Outlined below is a cost comparison for a legislative member to purchase 15 years of state legislator plan service credit:

 

Current cost to purchase 15 years of service credit:

 

(($250 annual amount of pension X 10) + $100 member contribution) X 15 years = $39,000

 

Cost to purchase 15 years of service credit under this amendment:

 

(3 X $100 normal member contribution) X 15 years = $4,500

 

Therefore, under this bill a legislator member would pay $34,500 less than the current cost to purchase 15 years of service credit.

 

     Synopsis of SFC Amendment

 

The amendments adopted by the Senate Finance Committee limit to one year the purchase of service credit instead of five years as proposed originally.

 

     Synopsis of Original Bill

 

Senate Bill 378 amends the Public Employees Retirement Act to allow PERA members who are vested (possess five or more years of service credit) to purchase up to five years of service credit.

 

     Significant Issues

 

According to PERA, the primary policy issue raised by SB 378 is whether a PERA member should be able to purchase 5 years of service credit for time not earned.  Current law requires that all other service credit in the public employees retirement systems must be earned either through service to a public employer, military or prisoner of war service.  The service credit in Senate Bill 378 is not tied to any service requirement.  There is no provision currently in law to allow service credit purchase for time that is not served in some manner.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

According to PERA, in the absence of an actuarial determination, the fiscal impact of SB 378 is unknown at this time. Therefore, it may be contrary to NM Const., Art. XX, Section 22 (no benefits may be enhanced unless the costs of those benefits are properly funded in accordance with actuarial standards).

 

Senate Bill 378 requires PERA members to pay the full actuarial present value for purchased service credit. However, PERA’s actuaries will charge a fee for each actuarial present value request.  PERA does not know how many of their 44,030 active members will seek to purchase service credit.  It is logical to assume that if PERA members know of this provision in law, they would all request a purchase estimate.

Additionally, since the full actuarial cost of the service credit will be based on the member’s salary at the time of purchase, PERA members may purchase service credit earlier in their careers when it is less costly.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

Currently, requests for the purchase of service credit are limited to those who have served in the military or who meet very specific criteria.  SB 378 expands the group of persons eligible to purchase service credit and will thus increase demands on PERA staff in responding to membership inquiries relating to the purchase of service credit.

 

Additionally, PERA would be required to amend its regulations to address the statutory changes to the PERA Act.

 

RLG/prr/njw:yr