NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
SEC |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Medical Student Loans |
SB |
CS/214/aSPAC |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Maloy |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Narrative |
|
|
Relates to HB 141.
Responses
Received on Original SB 214 from
Department
of Health
State
Department of Education
Taxation
and Revenue Department
Committee
on Higher Education
New analyses were not received on SB 214/
SECS. There is a significant overlap of
issues discussed in the analyses of the original bill. These issues have been incorporated into this
analysis where applicable.
The Senate Public
Affairs Committee has amended SB 214 to eliminate the appropriation of $500.00
from the general fund to the health professional loan repayment fund for
expenditure in FY 04 and subsequent fiscal years for the purpose of making
loans pursuant to the Health Professional Loan Repayment Act.
Synopsis of Original Bill
1.
Senate Bill 214 /SECS amends
the Health Professional Loan Repayment Act to provide loans to health
professionals specializing in certain field who agree to practice in
2.
The bill also exempts certain stipends
and awards from taxation. The bill
enacts a new provision in the Gross Receipts and Compensating Tax Act which
provides:
“Exempted from the gross receipts tax are the receipts of a health professional received as a stipend pursuant to the Health Services Corps Act and awards received pursuant to the Health Professional Loan Repayment Act.”
3.
The bill makes an appropriation of $500.0
from the general fund to the health professional loan repayment fund for
expenditure in FY 04, and subsequent fiscal years, for the purpose of making
loans pursuant to the Health Professional Loan Repayment Act. Unexpended or unencumbered balances at the
end of a fiscal year shall not revert to the general fund.
4.
The bill vests the “health profession
advisory committee” (responsible for advising the commission on higher
education on matters relating to student loans to health professionals) with
two additional responsibilities, to include:
a.
Identifying areas of shortage and acute
shortage of health care providers in
b.
Designate fields of specialization in
medicine wherein
5.
Finally, SB 214 / SECS contains minor
grammatical corrections to, and addition of the “acute shortage” criteria in,
Section 21-22D-4, NMSA 1978. This
section of law establishes the commission on higher education’s
(“commission’s”) duties regarding administration of awards for health education
expenses for applicants declaring an intent to
practice in
Significant Issues
1.
Exemption from state income taxation
would improve the incentive value of stipend awards.
2.
According to the Taxation and Revenue
Department, there has long been confusion on which taxation provisions stipends
and similar awards are exempted. This
bill makes this clear by expressly tying the exemption to gross receipts
taxation.
3.
Medical education is expensive. The cost of one year’s tuition and fees at
the
However,
the student loan for service program currently makes awards to medical students
based upon student’s demonstrated financial need, as assessed by university
financial aid officers. The existing
guidelines for assessing students’ financial need may not result in an
award level sufficient to create an effective incentive plan. The guidelines and levels
of award generated need to be examined.
4.
The medical student loan for service
program provides financial support to medical students during post-secondary
medical school training. Students will
not be eligible to practice in a specialty until at least 7-8 years after entry
into medical school. More often a specialist may not be ready for practice
until at least 10 years after entry into medical school. The proposed expansion
of the medical student loan for service program to specialists will not bring
new physicians into service for 3-5 years after its implementation.
Given
this delay, expansion of the Health Professional Loan Repayment Program is key to addressing the immediate need for specialists
by attracting those that are already in practice.
SB
214 / SECS does expand this program and moves
5. The
SB 214 appropriates $500.0 from the
general fund to the health professional loan repayment fund for expenditure in
FY 04 and subsequent fiscal years for the purpose of making loans pursuant to
the Health Professional Loan Repayment Act.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance at the end of a fiscal year shall
not revert to the general fund.
The
Department of Health and State Department of Education report there will be no direct
administrative impact on either the Department of Health or the State
Department of Education. However, the
Department of Heath will be required to step-up its coordination efforts with
the commission on higher education on the medical student loan repayment
program. This can be accommodated within existing staffing levels. .
The bill does not direct
shortage/specialty loan award levels.
The student loan for service program currently makes awards to medical
students based upon the individual student’s demonstrated financial need, as
assessed by university financial aid officers.
The guidelines used to assess financial need may not result in an award
level that is sufficient to serve as an incentive to commit to a
shortage-designated specialty and to working in
Attract currently licensed physicians by offering similar opportunities for repayment of loans obtained from other sources.