NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Lujan |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
681 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Family Caregiver Support Services |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Hayes |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
$350.0 |
|
|
Recurring |
General
Fund* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 32, HB 81, HB 171,
SB 77, SB 217, SB 377 and SB 383
Responses
Received From
State
Agency on Aging
Legislative Finance
Committee Budget Analyses, 2003-2004
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 681
appropriates $350.0 to the State Agency on Aging for family caregiver support
services. Specifically, it appropriates
$200.0 for developing and implementing a 24-hour caregiver hotline and $150.0
for developing and implementing a care corps pilot program to recruit and
retain paraprofessional caregivers in institutional and community-based
long-term care settings by providing the caregivers with lottery scholarship
benefits.
Significant
Issues
In its analysis, the New Mexico Lottery
Authority states that the language is not clear whether Section (2) of HB 681
is an exception to the general scholarships requirements and/or if the $150,000
is from scholarship monies.
According to a recent
budget analysis of the Lottery Success Scholarship Program, fund balances are
expected to increase through FY08, and the fund will support current eligibility
guidelines and demographic projections through 2013. However, recurring expenditure growth is
projected by CHE to exceed recurring revenue growth in FY09. The CHE does not support changes to the
Lottery Success Scholarship Program.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
*The appropriation of
$350.0 contained in this bill may be a recurring expense to the general
fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered
balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2004 shall revert to the general
fund.
TECHNICAL ISSUE
*In section 1A, it states
that funding will be appropriated from the general fund for the caregiver
hotline and the care corps pilot program; however, paragraph (2) refers to
providing caregivers funds from the Lottery Scholarship Benefits. Clarification is needed regarding paragraph
(2). Is the $150.0 appropriation from
general fund only for administering the pilot project? Should the CHE or State Agency on Aging be
administering the caregiver lottery scholarships?
The term “paraprofessional caregiver” may need
to be defined more specifically so that individuals to whom this bill is
directed can apply for a lottery scholarship as a “caregiver” pursuant to this
legislation.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Since the “Care Corps”
is a pilot project, it is unclear whether funding ($150.0) is recurring.* As a pilot project, will an evaluation be
done after one year in order to assess the program? What will be the criteria to determine Care
Corps’ success or failure?
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP,
RELATIONSHIP
HB 32, Joint Lottery
Games
HB 81, Expand Lottery
Scholarship Institutions
HB 171, Expand Lottery
Tuition Scholarships
SB 77, Tuition
Scholarships for Teachers’ Kids
SB 217, Lottery
Tuition Scholarship Qualifications
SB 377, Tuition
Scholarships
SB 383, Allow for
Joint Lottery Games
ALTERNATIVES
A. There are state loan-for-service student
financial aid programs such as the Nursing Student Service Program and the
Allied Health Student Service Program that may also be available for caregivers. These programs seek to increase the number of
professionals in shortage areas of the state by providing educational loans to
qualifying students. As a condition of
the loan, the student must practice in a designated shortage area in the state.
B. Also, the Blue Ribbon Task Force recommended
a higher education funding formula in FY04.
The Plus Incentives component of the new formula includes establishment
of the Program Development Enhancement Fund, an “incentive” fund. For this fund, CHE recommended initial
funding of $3 million, while the LFC recommendation included $1.5 million of
general fund and $1 million of federal funds in the form of temporary
assistance for needy families block grant (TANF). The Program Development Enhancement Fund is
intended to facilitate the development or enhancement of academic and student
support programs defined as priorities for the future development of
CMH/sb