[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Lyons |
DATE TYPED: |
01/29/01 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
State Legislator Insurance Benefits |
SB |
176 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Gilbert |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.1 |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
$ 0.1 |
Recurring |
PERA
Trust Fund |
|
|
|
$ 0.1 |
Recurring |
NMRHC
Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
$ 0.1 |
$ 0.1 |
Recurring |
PERA
Trust Fund |
|
$ 0.1 |
$ 0.1 |
Recurring |
NMRHC Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC Files
Response Received From
Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
New Mexico Retiree Health Care Authority
(NMRHCA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
New Legislative Retiree Health Care Provisions
Senate Bill 176 would
allow former legislators and their dependents to participate in the New Mexico
Retiree Health Care Authority (NMRHCA) insurance programs, provided that such
legislators have served at least four years as a member of the legislature,
even if they did not retire under PERA State Legislator Member Coverage Plan 1.
New
Legislative Retirement Benefit Plan Provisions
Senate
Bill 176 amends Public Employee Retiree Association (PERA) State Legislator
Member Coverage Plan 1 to be applicable only to state legislators and
lieutenant governors who served terms of office that ended prior to January 1,
1999.
This
bill also creates a new State Legislator Member Coverage Plan 2, applicable to
state legislators and lieutenant governors who serve after December 31, 1998.
Under this new coverage plan, a legislator may retire at age 65 with 5 years of
service credit or at any age with 12 or more years of service credit. In addition, the annual amount of pension
under option A will be calculated according to a formula calculated by
multiplying the legislator’s contributions for his or her years of credited
service by a pension factor applicable to a graduated schedule of years of service.
For
example, a legislator with 12 years of service would pay a total of $4,800 in
contributions and then receive an annual pension of $12,000 per year for life.
The contributions can be made at the conclusion of service and there is no
accrued interest on such contributions.
Retiree Health Care Provisions
SB176 would amend the Retiree Health Care Act by
creating an additional class of individuals who would be eligible to
participate in the NMRHCA program.
Former legislators who previously served four or more years, but who are
currently excluded from participation, would now be eligible.
New PERA Benefit Plan Provisions
SB176 appears to apply
retroactively, thus allowing legislators who retired in calendar years after
December 31, 1998 through January 1,
2002, to “un-retire” and have their pension amount recalculated pursuant to the
newly created State Legislator Member Coverage Plan 2. No other PERA plan
allows members to un-retire and retire again without a minimum of three years
of service credit in the new plan.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Retiree Health Care Provisions
SB176 does not
contain an appropriation for legislator participation in the NMRHCA. If enacted however, it would not have an
adverse impact on the NMRHCA since the new legislative participants would pay
100% of their costs, plus a participation fee.
This bill will not result in additional costs to the NMRHCA. The bill
does result in new revenues, but the amounts are negligible since the contributors
are merely covering costs, and savings would not be cumulative.
New PERA Benefit Plan Provisions
The member
contribution into the proposed State Legislator Member Coverage Plan 2 is $400.00
(from $100.00 State Legislator Member Coverage Plan 1) for each year of
credited service. To be eligible for
coverage under State Legislator Coverage Plan for years prior to January 1,
2002, a legislator merely makes the necessary contributions in an amount that
totals $400.00 for each year of credited service.
Although PERA has not conducted an actuarial
analysis of State Legislator Member Coverage Plan 2, the additional
contributions from the general fund to make this plan actuarially sound would be
considerable. However, Section 9 of SB 176 allows PERA to annually request the
amount of contributions needed on an actuarial reserve basis, as it does under
current law.
According to PERA, their Board has not endorsed
this plan change and no actuarial study was requested for a new State
Legislator Member Coverage Plan 2 as proposed by SB 176.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to PERA, SB176 implements a
significant plan change that needs to be studied by PERA’s actuaries prior to
implementation. PERA also would be
required to administer another membership coverage plan, make changes to their
automated systems, and retroactively change some retired members pension
amounts.
Retiree Health Care Provisions
There may be a
question as to whether the enactment of this bill violates the Constitution’s
anti-donation clause. Program
participants who retired prior to their employer’s effective date with the
NMRHCA must pay an additional $5.00 participation fee to enroll in the NMRHCA
program since they did not make contributions to the program while
working. However, since SB176 proposes
that former legislators pay the additional $5.00 participation fee, in addition
to paying 100% of their costs under the program, this is probably not an issue.
New PERA Benefit Plan Provisions
In
the absence of PERA Board approval and a formal actuarial study for this
significant plan enhancement, PERA believes that SB176 may violate the
Constitution of New Mexico, Article XX, §22(E), which prohibits modifications
to public employment retirement systems that do not enhance or preserve the
actuarial soundness of the affected trust fund.
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.