NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Leavell DATE TYPED: 03/3/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: Carlsbad Water Rights Mediation SB 560/aSCONC
ANALYST: Chabot


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
 Recurring

or Non-Rec

 Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 200.0 Recurring General Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act HB2.

Duplicates HB 643



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

Carlsbad Irrigation District (CID)

Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)

Office of the State Engineer (SEO)



SUMMARY



     Synopsis of SCONC Amendment



The amendment strikes "and arbitration" from the bill so that the appropriation can only be used to support mediation pursuant to adjudication of water rights in the Carlsbad Irrigation District.



Synopsis of Original Bill



This bill appropriates $200.0 from the general fund to DFA for the purpose of contracting with the Carlsbad irrigation district to support mediation and arbitration processes pursuant to adjudications of water rights of individual landowner members.



Significant Issues



The adjudication of water rights in the Carlsbad irrigation district has been on-going for more than 40 years. SEO is concerned that this bill would add an "additional layer of complexity" to a complex and time-consuming adjudication effort. This could further delay the adjudication process. They state that they are already involved in an information mediation of claims and seek to establish dialogue and compromise to the extent allowed by law. Finally, SEO states that the bill would create a judicial standing for the Carlsbad irrigation district to participate in the subfile proceedings that are on-going between the SEO and the district members.



On the other hand, CID states that SEO is sending district members "intimidating letters telling them to 'take the States's offer or we'll just go to court.'" The members of the district have varied financial status and find the prospect of court proceedings threatening. CID states that they desire a formal mediation process very similar to that ongoing in the adjudications of the Elephant Butte Irrigation District in the lower Rio Grande. CID anticipates that mediation will be less expensive than court proceedings.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The appropriation of $200.0 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2002 shall revert to the general fund. HB 2 has an appropriation for this amount and for the same purpose to SEO.



DUPLICATION



This bill is the same as HB 643.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



To address SEO concerns about giving the Carlsbad irrigation district standing in on-going adjudication efforts, recommend that lines 19, 20, and 21, be amended to read: "with the Carlsbad irrigation district to assist individual landowners in the adjudication of water rights".



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



DFA states that for the past two years the Local Government Division has managed contracts with acequia association in Northern New Mexico concern water rights adjudications and these contracts could serve as model for similar contracts with the Carlsbad irrigation district.



POSSIBLE QUESTIONS