NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Rodriguez | DATE TYPED: | 02/08/01 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Increase Fire Protection Fund Distributions | SB | 21 | ||||
ANALYST: | Valenzuela |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
See Narrative |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Subsequent
Years Impact |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||
FY01 | FY02 | |||
$ (3,100.0) | Recurring | General Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Office of the State Fire Marshal
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 21 amends the "Fire Protection Fund Law" to increase the distributions to qualifying main station and substation fire districts by approximately 20 percent. The bill also makes minor technical corrections.
Significant Issues
The Fire Protection Fund law identifies the funding formula for making distributions to fire districts from the Fire Protection Fund. The Fund was created to pay for the operating expenses of both the State Fire Marshal's Office and for the State Firefighter Training Academy, as well as the distributions made to the fire districts. The law also defines the criteria for counties and municipalities to meet in order to receive state funding.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Fire districts have argued for a larger distribution from the Fund for a number of years. Over the past 10 years, the annual distributions to fire districts have averaged $12.8 million. Although, in 1999, the distribution total increased over the 1998 level by 10.8 percent and has remained near this amount (Attachment 1). Senate Bill 21 would increase the distribution by 20 percent to $18.6 million. However, the distributions have increased as a percentage of total funds. From 1994 to 1998, the distribution percent fell to below 40 percent (Attachment 2).
Enactment of Senate Bill 21 would have a negative fiscal impact on the general fund because any amounts remaining in the fund, after distributions, revert to the general fund. The 20 percent increase in the distribution could cost $3.1 million, based on an average distribution of $15.5 million annually.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Enactment of Senate Bill 21 would have only a minor administrative impact on the State Fire Marshal's Office.
MFV/njw:ar