NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Stell DATE TYPED: 02/17/01 HB HJM 33
SHORT TITLE: Cooperation in Development of Water Policies SB
ANALYST: Dotson


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
See Fiscal

Impact



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of the State Engineer, Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department and the Game and Fish Department.



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



HJM 33 requests the Office of the State Engineer, the Interstate Stream Commission, the various irrigation and conservancy districts, acequias, municipalities, water utilities and other water interest groups cooperate in managing the water resources of the State of New Mexico.



Significant Issues



The need for cooperation and consensus from the many stakeholders in New Mexico's water issues is necessary. Creating and possible formalizing a consensus building environment would require significant participation by all stakeholders.



The benefit of cooperation and consensus to New Mexico's future direction and development would be significant.



PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS



Cooperation implies participation. Significant participation would affect the State Departments and Agencies participating by funneling resources away from current programs.







FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



If the participation of State Departments and Agencies became significant them additional FTEs may be required.



POSSIBLE QUESTIONS



1. Is cooperation and consensus possible with all the various stakeholders?



2. In what ways could cooperation and consensus be developed?



PD/ar