NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Park DATE TYPED: 02/26/01 HB 936
SHORT TITLE: Private Remedies Against HMOs SB
ANALYST: Wilson


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02

See Narrative



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Health Policy Commission (HPC)

Public Regulatory Commission (PRC)

Retiree Health Care Authority (RHCA)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



HB936 allows an HMO enrollee to bring an action to recover actual damages. It also deletes a provision from existing law that states that an HMO authorized under the provisions of the HMO Law is not deemed to be practicing medicine and an HMO is no longer exempt from laws relating to the practice of medicine.



Significant Issues



Consumers have expressed concerns and frustrations about their ability to challenge the decisions of Health Maintenance Organizations regarding coverage for treatment of illness or injury. The statutory right of enrollees to seek redress for actual damages from HMOs may alleviate this frustration. HMOs will have to examine their administrative processes regarding their case-by-case evaluation of whether to provide payment for treatment of certain illnesses or injuries. This administrative process will have to balance the needs of consumers and the financial viability of the HMO. At some point, HMOs will also have to decide how to balance challenges to their decisions regarding payment for treatment versus legal challenges.









FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



HB 936 allows enrollees to recover damages from an HMO and holds them responsible for the laws governing the practice of medicine. HB 936 may make it more expensive for the HMOs to operate which may cause HMO premiums to rise. Since the State pays the employer's share of the premiums for state employees, retirees and public school employees, there may be a negative financial impact which cannot be quantified by any of the agencies involved at this time.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The PRC indicated that HB 936 might result in additional complaints to the Division of Insurance, but could not quantify the administrative impact.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The HPC noted that many HMOs are currently experiencing financial difficulties. Nationally, about 30 percent of the population are currently enrolled in HMOs. While nearly 90 percent of the HMOs were profitable in 1994, with an average profit margin of 2.4 percent, in the third quarter of 1997 only 49 percent of the plans were profitable. In New Mexico, three of the five major managed care organizations providing financial information in 1997 reported negative operating profit margins. The financial vulnerability of these organizations puts many New Mexicans at-risk for loss of their health insurance coverage. The HPC suggests that a public and private partnership may be an alternative to the current instability, in the private, managed care system.



DW/ar