NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Knauer | DATE TYPED: | 03/07/01 | HB | 765/aHJC | ||
SHORT TITLE: | 5-Year Agreement for Private Jail Contractors | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Trujillo |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY01 | FY02 | FY01 | FY02 | ||
Recurring | General Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Attorney General (AG)
Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD)
Corrections Department (CD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HJC Amendments
The House Judiciary Committee amendments to HB 765 inserts wording to allow a privatized independent contractor to operate a jail or incarcerate prisoners therein for a period of up to five years.
Synopsis of Original Bill
HB765 amends existing Section 33-3-27 NMSA 1978 to provide that agreements with a private independent contractor for the operation of a jail or for the incarceration of prisoners therein shall be made for a period of five (5) years, but such agreements may allow for additional one (1) year extensions not to exceed a total of five (5) extensions. Existing law provides that such contracts shall not be longer than three (3) years.
The bill also contains minor clean-up language.
Significant Issues
The AG reports this does not conflict with the Procurement Code because of Section 13-1-98 (M).
CD reports it currently contracts with Lea County and Guadalupe County who, in turn, contract with a private entity to house CD inmates. The bill could result in an increase in the stability and
length of the Department's contracts with the counties. In other words, the bill could allow CD to
engage in longer-term planning with respect to housing their inmates in these privately-operated facilities.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
According to CD, HB765 could result in a minor increase in efficiency with regard to the department's planning function as it relates to placing inmates in these privately-operated facilities.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
CD reports the bill will have little, if any, fiscal impact upon the department. Staff cautions that the bill as written may allow existing contracts with the private entities to continue with the current escalator clauses up to ten years without any renegotiation.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to CD, in the long-term, the bill could result in a minimal decrease in the administrative burden upon department personnel who are required to negotiate the contracts regarding placement of its inmates in these privately-operated facilities.
LT/ar/njw