45th legislature - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - first session, 2001

RELATING TO ELECTRIC UTILITIES; DELAYING CUSTOMER CHOICE PROVISIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY RESTRUCTURING ACT OF 1999.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:

Section 1. Section 62-3A-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 4) is amended to read:

"62-3A-4. IMPLEMENTATION OF CUSTOMER CHOICE--PRIOR PLANS AND APPROVALS--REVIEW BY COMMISSION.--

A. Except as provided in Sections [16 and 17 of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999] 62-3A-16 and 62-3A-17 NMSA 1978, customer choice service shall be available as follows:

(1) for public post-secondary educational institutions and public schools [as defined in Section 22-1-2 NMSA 1978] and for residential and small business customers, on January 1, [2001] 2007; and

(2) for all other customers of electricity, on [January 1,2002 ] July 1, 2008.

B. A plan or approval for customer choice, disposition of stranded costs, preparation for open access or competitive supply service for a public utility granted by the commission between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 1998 may be reviewed by the commission, in conjunction with the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999. After notice and public hearing, the plan or approval shall be confirmed, rejected or modified by the commission on or before November 30, 1999. Modifications to a plan or an approval may be recommended by the commission, the public utility subject to the plan or approval or a party with standing.

C. A public utility having had a plan or approval granted by the commission after January 1, 1997 shall be subject to the requirements of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 to the extent the requirements of that act are not inconsistent with the plan or approval, as confirmed, rejected or modified in accordance with Subsection B of this section.

D. The commission may delay customer choice and other dates established in the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 by up to one year upon finding that an orderly implementation of customer choice cannot be accomplished without the delay."

Section 2. Section 62-3A-6 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 6) is amended to read:

"62-3A-6. TRANSITION PLANS.--

A. A public utility shall file a transition plan that complies with the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 with the commission no later than [March 1, 2000] January 1, 2005 for commission approval on or before [December 1, 2000] October 1, 2006. The transition plan shall include a detailed description of the public utility's:

(1) proposal and alternatives to separate its supply service and energy-related service assets from its distribution and transmission services assets pursuant to Section [8 of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999] 62-3A-8 NMSA 1978;

(2) associated unbundled cost-of-service studies and an explanation of all cost allocations made to the unbundled services;

(3) proposed methodologies to allow residential and small business customers to have customer choice without requiring additional end-use metering equipment;

(4) proposals to implement customer choice and open access;

(5) proposed standard offer service tariffs, exclusive of price terms that shall be incorporated prior to customer choice, for residential and small business customers that do not select a power supplier pursuant to customer choice eligibility;

(6) proposed competitive procurement process or other process for the selection of power supply for standard offer service tariffs, together with a proposed rate setting procedure. The initial procurement of power for standard offer service shall occur at least three months prior to customer choice, or earlier as determined by the commission, so that price terms can be the basis for determination of stranded costs;

(7) proposed tariffs for distribution service for customers and competitive power suppliers, and transmission service, either on file with a federal regulatory agency having jurisdiction or as proposed by the public utility;

(8) the projected amounts of stranded costs and transition costs sought to be recovered by the public utility;

(9) proposed non-bypassable wires charges for recovery of transition costs and stranded costs allocated among customer classes;

(10) proposed system for the collection, recovery and accounting of the system benefits charge and stranded and transition costs through wires charges;

(11) proposed customer education programs, necessary computer hardware and software modifications and meter upgrades necessary to provide open access;

(12) proposed procedures for balancing, settlements and communications with competitive power suppliers; and

(13) any other information, documentation or justification requested by the commission.

B. The commission in making its determination of the amount of stranded costs to be recovered by a public utility in its transition plan filing shall order no less than fifty percent recovery of stranded costs. The commission may allow up to one hundred percent recovery of stranded costs only if it finds that recovery of more than fifty percent of stranded costs:

(1) is in the public interest;

(2) is necessary to maintain the financial integrity of the public utility;

(3) is necessary to continue adequate and reliable service by the public utility; and

(4) will not cause an increase in rates to residential or small business customers during the transition period.

C. The commission in quantifying stranded costs shall consider:

(1) mitigation efforts and results;

(2) reasonable methods for determining market valuations, including:

(a) the use of standard offer bid prices;

(b) appraisal by independent third-party professionals;

(c) a competitive bid sale for generation; and

(d) any other method designed to provide a reasonable valuation;

(3) for residential and small business customers, that the standard offer bid price may [relfect] reflect the current market value of supply service; and

(4) that recoverable stranded costs must be fair and equitable to customers, utility investors and the public.

D. Before July 1, [2000] 2005, the commission shall approve the procurement procedure proposed by the public utility in its transition plan for the acquisition of supply service for standard offer service. On or before September 1, [2000] 2006, a public utility shall update its pending transition plan filing by providing the price of supply service procured for standard offer service pursuant to the procurement procedure approved by the commission. The approval of stranded costs to be recovered from the residential and small business classes shall be made after the public utility has contracted to procure power for the standard offer, but prior to December 1, [2000] 2006.

E. After notice and public hearing, the commission shall issue a final order approving or modifying a public utility's transition plan, including tariffs for just and reasonable rates for distribution service, transmission service, subject to federal jurisdiction, and standard offer services. All interested parties shall be afforded an opportunity to participate and be heard on any matter contained in a transition plan filing. The commission may initiate an inquiry into an approved transition plan's implementation and operation, if the public interest requires."

Section 3. Section 62-3A-7 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 7) is amended to read:

"62-3A-7. RECOVERY OF TRANSITION AND STRANDED COSTS--

OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITS.--

A. The commission shall determine the non-bypassable wires charges for the recovery of transition costs and stranded costs as described in Section [6 of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999] 62-3A-6 NMSA 1978. B. As to stranded cost recovery, the non-bypassable wires charge established shall:

(1) be calculated to begin on the eligibility date of customer choice for each customer class;

(2) not extend longer than five years thereafter, provided that the commission may separate nuclear decommissioning for recovery over a longer period of time through a separate wires charge if it determines that such recovery is in the public interest; and

(3) shall be equitably designed in a competitively neutral manner that ensures that the class pays no more than the stranded costs associated with that class.

C. In its approval of a transition plan provided for in Section [6 of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999] 62-3A-6 NMSA 1978, the commission shall determine a non-bypassable wires charge for recovery of transition costs through December 31, [2007] 2012, after which date further transition charges shall not be recoverable through a separate wires charge.

D. The commission or the public utility may seek to consider and modify or continue the wires charge established to achieve collection of the transition costs. If an over-collection of transition costs is determined by the commission to have occurred, a wires credit shall be applied to customers' bills to return the over-collection of transition costs in an amount and for such time as the commission may determine.

E. Nothing in the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 is intended to affect the ability of a public utility to recover wholesale stranded costs, including stranded costs recovered from wholesale customers under contract.

F. Nothing in the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 shall be interpreted to require the commission to make any order involving rates or wires charges that would result in a public utility losing its eligibility:

(1) for accelerated depreciation or other tax benefits for federal income tax purposes; or

(2) to exclusively use external sinking fund methods for decommissioning obligations pursuant to federal guidelines."

Section 4. Section 62-3A-8 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 8) is amended to read:

"62-3A-8. DIVESTITURE NOT REQUIRED--AFFILIATES--SEPARATION OF REGULATED FROM COMPETITIVE FUNCTIONS--PROHIBITIONS AGAINST CROSS-SUBSIDIES, DISCRIMINATION AND ANTI-COMPETITIVE ACTIONS--DECLARATION REGARDING ANTITRUST ACTIONS.--

A. The Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 does not require nor shall it be construed to require nor shall the commission require a public utility to divest itself of any of its assets owned, leased or in which an interest is held, owned or leased on the effective date of that act.

B. Before [January 1, 2001] July 2, 2006, a public utility shall separate into at least two corporations, separating supply service and energy-related service consisting of generation and power supply facilities, operations and services and energy-related facilities, operations and services that are to be made available to the public pursuant to the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 on a competitive unregulated basis from transmission and distribution services consisting of transmission facilities, operations and service, distribution facilities, operations and service and customer billing and metering that are to be made available to the public pursuant to that act on a regulated basis.

C. Corporate separation of regulated from unregulated services shall be accomplished by either the creation of separate affiliated companies that may be owned by a common holding company, through the creation of separate non-affiliated corporations or through the sale of assets to one or more third parties. A public utility may provide all competitive and ancillary services within a single unregulated company and provide all non-competitive and ancillary services within a separate regulated company. Unregulated service shall not be provided by a regulated company.

D. Prior to customer choice pursuant to the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999, the commission shall adopt codes of conduct applicable to public utilities that shall contain provisions that:

(1) prevent undue discrimination in favor of affiliates;

(2) prevent any anti-competitive practices that could harm competition in any market for competitive services, including practices that unfairly impede a customer from self-generating a portion of his supply service requirements;

(3) grant customers and their competitive power suppliers access to a public utility's retail distribution and transmission facilities on a non-discriminatory basis at the same rates, terms and conditions of service of use by the public utility and its affiliates;

(4) prevent the disclosure of any individual customer information to any person, including an affiliate, unless the customer provides written consent except as otherwise directed in a rulemaking by the commission;

(5) prevent the disclosure of any aggregated customer information to any person, including an affiliate, unless the same information is timely made available on the same basis to all competitors;

(6) require that any person, including an affiliate, possessing customer information obtained in a manner contrary to Paragraphs (4) and (5) of this subsection shall make no commercial use of the information and either destroy the information or return it to the public utility;

(7) provide that transactions between a public utility and an affiliate do not involve any subsidies between them and do not jeopardize reliability of the electric system, including its interconnections; and

(8) prevent an affiliate from identifying its affiliation with the public utility unless the affiliate also discloses in a reasonable manner that it is neither the same company as the public utility nor is it regulated by the commission.

E. A public utility shall not subsidize competitive services provided by an affiliate. A public utility shall file with the commission a statement of policy and procedure, consistent with the commission's codes of conduct and subject to commission approval, to avoid any subsidy to an affiliate. The statement of policy and procedure shall:

(1) describe the separation of services made pursuant to Subsection B of this section; and

(2) describe the safeguards instituted to prevent the sharing with an affiliate of employees, goods, services or facilities, except that common costs for essential corporate-wide services shall be allocated between the public utility and affiliates to reflect the proportional benefit that the public utility receives from those services compared to the affiliates receiving the services, and provided that a public utility may purchase goods, services or facilities from an affiliate if the items cannot be provided internally or obtained from an independent person at an equal or lower price or other factors such as quality or service that justify a higher purchase price. The commission may promulgate rules regarding the transfer of employees, provided that the commission shall not require or approve a policy or procedure that interferes with an employee's ability to apply for and be considered for a position of his choice.

F. A public utility shall not coerce or entice, either by act or omission, a customer to purchase the goods or services of an affiliated unregulated company over the goods or services of its competitors.

G. A public utility shall not engage in monopoly coercion. Complaints alleging monopoly coercion may be filed with the commission or district court and, if filed, shall be placed at the head of the docket; and after notice and hearing, shall be resolved expeditiously. Filing a complaint for monopoly coercion with the commission pursuant to this section neither precludes nor excludes other remedies available pursuant to law and is not a prerequisite for seeking relief otherwise available. The attorney general shall have standing on behalf of consumers to file a complaint initiating or to intervene in a case before the commission alleging monopoly coercion.

H. If the commission finds and orders that monopoly coercion has occurred, after notice and hearing, the commission may fine the public utility or its affiliate or issue such cease and desist orders as are deemed necessary in accordance with the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999. Attorney fees and costs shall be awarded to a prevailing complainant. If the defendant prevails, attorney fees and costs shall be awarded upon a commission finding that the complaint was either frivolous or made in bad faith.

I. The state and all regulatory bodies and agencies acting pursuant to state policy do not supervise or condone any actions of a competitive power supplier or monopoly coercion activities of a public utility that are or would be unlawful pursuant to the Antitrust Act or any federal antitrust act. The provisions of Section 57-1-16 NMSA 1978 are not a defense to an antitrust violation or monopoly coercion charge against a competitive power supplier or monopoly coercion charge against a public utility.

J. Public utilities that provide both electricity and natural gas distribution services shall not be required to functionally separate their electric and gas transmission, transportation and distribution operations from each other, and any rule or order to the contrary is void [and to no force and effect]; and provided that any regulated natural gas distribution operations operated within the same legal entity as regulated electric operations shall be subject to Subsections E and G of this section; and provided further that nothing in this section shall prevent a combined gas and electric distribution company from selling the natural gas commodity to customers pursuant to tariffs approved by the commission.

K. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require any commission act or order prior to filing an action pursuant to the Antitrust Act or any federal antitrust act or to limit the authority of the attorney general granted in the Antitrust Act."

Section 5. Section 62-3A-13 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 13) is amended to read:

"62-3A-13. SYSTEM BENEFITS CHARGE--RECOVERY.--A "system benefits charge" in the amount of three hundredths of one cent ($.0003) per kilowatt-hour is created and imposed on all retail kilowatt-hour sales in the state billed by public utilities, municipal utilities and distribution cooperative utilities beginning January 1, [2002] 2007. On January 1, [2007] 2012, the system benefits charge shall increase to six hundredths of one cent ($.0006) per kilowatt-hour. The commission shall eliminate any portion of the system benefits charge that is not being used for the purposes specified in Section [15 of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999] 62-3A-15 NMSA 1978. The system benefits charge shall be separately identified on bills rendered to customers beginning on January 1, [2002] 2007."

Section 6. Section 62-3A-16 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 16) is amended to read:

"62-3A-16. DISTRIBUTION COOPERATIVE UTILITIES.--

A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999, this section governs distribution cooperative utilities and generation and transmission cooperatives with respect to [the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999] that act.

B. A generation and transmission cooperative may provide power and energy to its members and shall be subject to regulation by the commission pursuant to the Public Utility Act. A generation and transmission cooperative shall not provide supply service at retail unless it is a licensed competitive power supplier and provides open access in accordance with the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999.

C. A distribution cooperative utility is not a public utility for the purposes of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999. A distribution cooperative utility, however, remains subject to the jurisdiction and authority of the commission to the same extent it was regulated by the commission prior to the effective date of that act.

D. To the extent that it elects a business method option pursuant to Subsection I of this section other than load aggregator, a distribution cooperative utility shall file a business method plan with the commission within sixty days of the election that shall include the following:

(1) the business method option elected, the method of election and other relevant authorizations and approvals of the option;

(2) the costs, liabilities and investments that the distribution cooperative utility seeks to recover from customers who choose supply service other than from the distribution cooperative utility;

(3) the amount of the costs, liabilities and investments and the methodologies used by the distribution cooperative utility to determine the amount of costs, liabilities and investments that the distribution cooperative utility reasonably expected to recover through rates if bundled service had continued, reduced by the results of appropriate mitigation efforts taken by the distribution cooperative utility to offset the costs, liabilities and investments;

(4) the methodologies by which the distribution cooperative utility shall compute an exit fee or a non-bypassable non-discriminatory charge for customers choosing a competitive power supplier to provide supply services;

(5) a description of the implementation and operation of the business method option, the period during which it is estimated to be implemented, the customer information and notification that the distribution cooperative utility intends to provide to its service customers; and

(6) tariffs for service to its service customers, including either exit fees or non-bypassable non-discriminatory charges to seek to recover costs, liabilities and investments sought to be recovered due to the change from bundled to unbundled service.

E. The business method plan is deemed approved by the commission within six months after the date of its filing, unless after notice and hearing the commission either rejects or modifies the business method plan filing.

F. Notwithstanding the business method option elected by the distribution cooperative utility, the distribution cooperative utility shall:

(1) make standard offer service, as approved by the commission, available to its residential and small business customers;

(2) provide distribution service to its service customers; and

(3) not provide or permit a competitive advantage to a competitive power supplier.

G. A distribution cooperative utility organized pursuant to the laws of another state and providing bundled services in this state on the effective date of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 to not more than twenty percent of its total customers may file an application with the commission seeking approval of its election to be governed by the laws related to electric restructuring of the state where organized. The commission shall approve the application if the distribution cooperative utility:

(1) does not provide supply service to other than its service customers in this state; and

(2) remains subject to the jurisdiction and authority of the commission for bundled service provided in this state.

H. On or before January 1, [2002] 2007, a distribution cooperative utility shall elect through its board of trustees a business method of providing supply service to its service customers from the options described in Subsection I of this section. The chosen business method may be implemented over a three-year period or less, after commission approval. The distribution cooperative utility shall not:

(1) transmit supply service over its facilities for competitive power suppliers to any service customer, except in accordance with provisions of a business method plan approved by the commission; or

(2) convert or permit the conversion of a retail service delivery point on its system to a wholesale service delivery point without the approval of the commission.

I. A distribution cooperative utility may elect to provide service to its service customers using one of the following business methods of supply service:

(1) load aggregator method, pursuant to which the distribution cooperative utility:

(a) shall acquire and provide supply service;

(b) may aggregate its customers by class or otherwise;

(c) shall provide supply, transmission and distribution services; and

(d) shall remain subject to regulation by the commission to the same extent as it was regulated prior to the effective date of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 and its election;

(2) customer-directed supplier, pursuant to which a retail customer may select a competitive service provider from a list of competitive supply service proposals obtained by the distribution cooperative utility. The distribution cooperative utility shall determine the competitive supply service proposals that will be offered to customers by competitive power suppliers pursuant to non-discriminatory rules adopted by the distribution cooperative utility and approved by the commission;

(3) customer class direct access, pursuant to which one or more classes of retail customers satisfying criteria determined by the distribution cooperative utility and approved by the commission may contract directly with a competitive power supplier. [A] The criteria established for class eligibility may be expanded to permit greater eligibility for customer class direct access, subject to commission approval. The distribution cooperative utility shall not be obligated to supply service or identify potential supply services for customer class direct access customers; and

(4) direct access, pursuant to which all retail customers may contract with a competitive power supplier for supply service and the distribution cooperative utility distributes power from the competitive power supplier's delivery point on its system to the retail customer's premises. Direct access shall be provided in a non-discriminatory manner. The distribution cooperative utility shall not be obligated to supply service or identify potential supply services for direct access customers.

J. A distribution cooperative utility may set a reasonable exit fee or a non-bypassable non-discriminatory charge to recover costs, liabilities and investments that would have reasonably been recovered, if not mitigated, pursuant to cost-of-service ratemaking for bundled service. An exit fee or a non-bypassable non-discriminatory charge may be assessed to a customer eligible to select and selecting supply service other than from the distribution cooperative utility's standard offer service or otherwise.

K. Distribution cooperative utilities shall notify their customers within twelve months after the effective date of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 concerning the terms of this section and other applicable terms of that act. A distribution cooperative utility electing an option of conducting its business other than as a load aggregator shall inform its service customers of the major impacts of the customer choices available pursuant to the elected option.

L. Nothing in the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 shall be deemed:

(1) to require a distribution cooperative utility to do any act that might result in the loss of its exemption from income taxes; or

(2) to apply to, interfere with, abrogate or change the rights of a party under a wholesale power supply, mortgage or other financing agreement to which a distribution cooperative utility is a party."

Section 7. Section 62-3A-17 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 17) is amended to read:

"62-3A-17. MUNICIPAL UTILITIES.--

A. This section governs municipal utilities in relation to the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999. Except as provided in Subsection E of this section, a municipal utility is neither a public utility, a distribution company nor a transmission company pursuant to [the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999] that act.

B. Except for a municipality authorized to condemn facilities pursuant to Subsections E and F of Section 3-24-1 NMSA 1978, which is deemed to have chosen to participate in customer choice for its service customers effective January 1, [2002] 2007, a municipal governing body is authorized to elect whether and when its municipal utility participates in customer choice and open access for competitive services to its service customers. A municipal governing body is authorized to elect whether and when its municipal utility participates in customer choice and open access to offer supply service and competitive services to customers in addition to its service customers. A decision by a municipal governing body to participate in customer choice and open access for its service customers only or its service customers and other customers at any time after January 1, [2002] 2007 shall be made by the adoption of an appropriate ordinance or resolution, which decision once made is thereafter irrevocable. A municipal utility may not participate in customer choice or open access for customers other than its service customers unless and until its service customers are eligible for customer choice with open access available to fulfill a customer's choice of supply service.

C. If a municipal governing body elects not to participate in customer choice and open access, its municipal utility shall be regulated by the commission to the same extent as it was regulated prior to the effective date of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 and shall not offer any service to retail customers other than to its service customers.

D. A municipality deemed by the provisions of Subsections E and F of Section 3-24-1 NMSA 1978 to have elected to participate in customer choice for its service customers or any other municipality that elects by its governing body to participate in customer choice and open access for its service [consumers] customers, shall, by its municipal governing body:

(1) establish rates, terms and conditions pursuant to which the municipal utility shall provide open access over its distribution facilities and unbundled services to its service customers, including standard offer service;

(2) provide open access on a non-discriminatory, competitively neutral basis pursuant to terms and conditions comparable to that applied to itself;

(3) establish procedures for complaint to and hearing by the municipal governing body by any person aggrieved by the terms and conditions and operation of open access to the distribution facilities of the municipal utility. Decisions of the municipal governing body may be appealed by an aggrieved person to the district court in the district where the municipal utility is located;

(4) not provide or permit a competitive advantage to a competitive power supplier; and

(5) regulate its operation and service to its service customers.

E. When a municipal governing body elects for its municipal utility to provide competitive service to a customer other than its service customers, the municipal utility becomes and shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 to the extent competitive service is to be made available by the municipal utility to customers other than its service customers.

F. A municipal governing body shall notify the service customers of its municipal utility of the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 and its specific terms applicable to municipal utilities.

G. Nothing in the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 impairs the tax-exempt status of municipalities and municipal utilities.

H. For purposes of this section, "municipal governing body" means a commission, council or other entity vested with the power to control the management and operation of the municipal utility, in accordance with law."

Section 8. Section 62-3A-18 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 18) is amended to read:

"62-3A-18. FRANCHISE FEES--GROSS RECEIPTS TAX--TAX REVENUES ANALYSIS.--

A. A franchise fee charge shall be stated as a separate line entry on a public utility's or distribution cooperative utility's bills and shall only be recovered from customers located within the jurisdiction of the government authority imposing the franchise fee.

B. Any gross receipts taxes collected on electric service received by retail customers in the state shall be stated as a separate line entry on a bill for electric service sent to the customer by a public utility or distribution cooperative utility.

C. The New Mexico legislative council shall [annually through January 1, 2002] refer to the revenue stabilization and tax policy committee questions and issues related to the amount of state and local tax revenues derived from previously regulated electric utility service and property and report to the legislature [annually] on the changed impact to state and local government tax revenues resulting from restructuring and competition in the electric industry.

D. [On or before January 1, 2003] The revenue stabilization and tax policy committee shall recommend legislative changes, if any, to establish comparable state and local taxation burdens on all market participants in the supply of electricity considering the impacts and changes that have resulted from the restructure and competition in the electric industry in the state."

Section 9. Section 62-3A-22 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, Chapter 294, Section 22) is amended to read:

"62-3A-22. COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS.--The commission shall docket a proceeding to review the system benefits charge and the system benefits fund, their operation and effectiveness, and then to make recommendations to the legislature by January 10, [2004] 2009 for any repeal of or changes to these provisions."