HOUSE BILL 436

45th legislature - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - first session, 2001

INTRODUCED BY

Joe Mohorovic







AN ACT

RELATING TO CAPITAL FELONY SENTENCING; PROVIDING THAT THE SUPREME COURT SHALL ISSUE A FINAL ADJUDICATION WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL IN A CAPITAL FELONY CASE; AMENDING A SECTION OF THE NMSA 1978.



BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:

Section 1. Section 31-20A-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1979, Chapter 150, Section 5) is amended to read:

"31-20A-4. REVIEW OF JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE.--

A. The judgment of conviction and sentence of death shall be automatically reviewed by the supreme court of the state of New Mexico, and within two years of the filing of a notice of appeal the supreme court shall issue a final adjudication.

B. In addition to the other matters on appeal, the supreme court shall rule on the validity of the death sentence.

C. The death penalty shall not be imposed if:

(1) the evidence does not support the finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance;

(2) the evidence supports a finding that the mitigating circumstances outweigh the aggravating circumstances;

(3) the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factor; or

(4) the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant.

D. No error in the sentencing proceeding shall result in the reversal of the conviction of a capital felony. If the trial court is reversed on appeal because of error only in the sentencing proceeding, the supreme court shall remand solely for a new sentencing proceeding. The new sentencing proceeding ordered and mandated shall apply only to the issue of punishment.

E. In cases of remand for a new sentencing proceeding, all exhibits and a transcript of all testimony and other evidence admitted in the prior trial and sentencing proceeding shall be admissible in the new sentencing proceeding, and:

(1) if the sentencing proceeding was before a jury, a new jury shall be impaneled for the new sentencing proceeding;

(2) if the sentencing proceeding was before a judge, the original trial judge shall conduct the new sentencing proceeding; or

(3) if the sentencing proceeding was before a judge and the original trial judge is unable or unavailable to conduct a new sentencing proceeding, then another judge shall be designated to conduct the new sentencing proceeding, and the parties are entitled to disqualify the new judge on the grounds set forth in Section 38-3-9 NMSA 1978 before the newly designated judge exercises any discretion."

Section 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the provisions of this act is July 1, 2001.

- 3 -