45th legislature - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - first session, 2001
RELATING TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY; ENACTING THE FORFEITURE ACT; AMENDING, REPEALING AND ENACTING SECTIONS OF THE NMSA 1978.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
Section 1. [NEW MATERIAL] SHORT TITLE.--Sections 1 through 12 of this act may be cited as the "Forfeiture Act".
Section 2. [NEW MATERIAL] PURPOSE OF ACT.--The purpose of the Forfeiture Act is to make uniform the standards and procedures for the seizure and forfeiture of property used or intended to be used in the commission of a crime.
Section 3. [NEW MATERIAL] DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Forfeiture Act:
A. "conviction" means an alleged violator has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or been found guilty in the trial court and has waived or exhausted all rights to an appeal;
B. "crime" means an offense punishable by imprisonment for one year or more, a violation of laws or rules regarding hunting or fishing or a violation of laws regarding gambling;
C. "law enforcement officer" means a state or municipal police officer, county sheriff, deputy sheriff, conservation officer, motor transportation enforcement officer or other state employee authorized by state law to enforce criminal statutes, but "law enforcement officer" does not include correctional officers;
D. "owner" means a person who has a legal or equitable ownership interest in property;
E. "property" means tangible or intangible personal property or real property; and
F. "property subject to forfeiture" means property described and declared to be subject to forfeiture by a state law outside of the Forfeiture Act.
Section 4. [NEW MATERIAL] JURISDICTION AND VENUE OF FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS.--A district court has jurisdiction of forfeiture proceedings. Venue for:
A. the issuance of a pre-seizure order and subsequent forfeiture proceedings pursuant to the order is in the district court for the county where the property alleged to be subject to forfeiture is located unless the property is a business, in which case venue is in the district court for the county where the principal office of the business is located; and
B. forfeiture proceedings of property seized without a prior court order is in the district court for the county in which the property was seized.
Section 5. [NEW MATERIAL] SEIZURE OF PROPERTY.--Property subject to forfeiture may be seized by a law enforcement agency:
A. pursuant to an order of seizure issued by a district court having jurisdiction based on a sworn application of a law enforcement officer from which a determination is made by the court that:
(1) there is a substantial probability that the state will prevail on the issue of forfeiture and that failure to enter the order will result in the property being destroyed, removed from the jurisdiction of the court or otherwise made unavailable for forfeiture; and
(2) the need to preserve the availability of the property through the entry of the requested order outweighs the hardship to the alleged owner and other parties known to be claiming interests in the property; and
B. if the property alleged to be subject to forfeiture is not a residence or a business, it may be seized by a law enforcement agency without a prior court order when:
(1) the seizure is incident to an arrest for a crime, a search conducted pursuant to a search warrant or an inspection conducted pursuant to an administrative inspection warrant and the law enforcement officer making the arrest or executing the search or inspection warrant has probable cause to believe the property to be subject to forfeiture and that the subject of the arrest, search warrant or administrative inspection warrant is an owner of the property;
(2) the property seized has been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state or a political subdivision in a criminal injunction or forfeiture proceeding; or
(3) the law enforcement officer making the seizure has probable cause to believe the property is subject to forfeiture and that the delay occasioned by the need to obtain a court order would frustrate the seizure.
Section 6. [NEW MATERIAL] POST-SEIZURE REQUIREMENTS.--Within thirty days after the seizure of property alleged to be subject to forfeiture, the law enforcement agency making the seizure shall:
A. if the property was seized without a prior court order:
(1) immediately apply for a court order of seizure;
(2) provide notice and an opportunity to be heard on the application by persons known to claim ownership or other interests in the property; and
(3) if the application for a seizure order is denied, return the property immediately to the owner unless possession of the property is illegal; and
B. if the property was seized pursuant to a court order or if the court enters an order of seizure pursuant to Subsection A of this section and the law enforcement agency determines to go forward with forfeiture proceedings against the property, it shall prosecute the crime in relation to which the property is alleged to be subject to forfeiture and the forfeiture proceedings in a bifurcated trial.
Section 7. [NEW MATERIAL] APPLICABLE RULES OF PROCEDURE.--In a bifurcated trial pursuant to the Forfeiture Act, the Rules of Criminal Procedure for the District Courts shall apply in the criminal prosecution, and the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts shall apply to the forfeiture.
Section 8. [NEW MATERIAL] BURDEN OF PROOF.--The state shall prove the elements necessary to adjudicate a forfeiture by clear and convincing evidence.
Section 9. [NEW MATERIAL] DETERMINATION OF OWNERSHIP--COMPLAINT--SUMMONS--NOTICE OF HEARING--SERVICE OF PROCESS.--
A. Within thirty days of seizure, the state shall file a complaint of forfeiture. The complaint shall include:
(1) a description of the property alleged to be subject to forfeiture;
(2) the date and place of seizure of the property;
(3) the name and address of the law enforcement agency making the seizure; and
(4) the reason the property is alleged to be subject to forfeiture.
B. Service of process shall be made in the manner required by Rule 1-004 NMRA for the service of a summons in a civil action and shall be served upon the person from whom the property was seized, the owner and all persons known or reasonably believed by the state to have an interest, whether ownership or some other interest, in the property.
C. If the property alleged to be subject to forfeiture is real property or a motor vehicle, the law enforcement agency seizing the property shall have a title search performed and shall include as persons to be served pursuant to Subsection B of this section all persons shown to have an ownership or security interest in the property.
Section 10. [NEW MATERIAL] COURT DETERMINATION.--
A. Claims to the property shall be filed by way of answer to the complaint of forfeiture and shall be filed within thirty days of the date of service of the complaint.
B. On the date set for hearing, the court shall proceed to adjudicate all claims to the property alleged to be subject to forfeiture. If no claims have been filed, the court may enter a judgment of forfeiture by default.
C. If the court determines that the person charged with the crime for which the property is alleged to be subject to forfeiture is not the owner of the property, the forfeiture proceeding shall be dismissed and the property shall be delivered to the person determined to be the owner unless possession of the property is illegal.
D. A party prevailing in its claim against the state that the person charged with the crime for which the property is alleged to be subject to forfeiture is not the owner of the property shall be awarded costs and reasonable attorney fees and shall not be subject to any charges by the state for storage of the property or expenses incurred in the preservation of the property. Costs and attorney fees shall not be awarded to the state. The law enforcement agency making the seizure of the property is liable for the costs and attorney fees awarded.
E. If claims have been filed and, after hearing, the court determines that the property is subject to forfeiture, it shall enter a judgment of forfeiture if:
(1) the criminal prosecution of the owner results in a conviction; and
(2) the value of the property forfeited does not unreasonably exceed the pecuniary gain derived or sought to be derived by the crime, the pecuniary loss caused or sought to be caused by the crime or the value of the convicted owner's interest in the property.
Section 11. [NEW MATERIAL] DISPOSITION OF FORFEITED PROPERTY.--Forfeited property, if it is not currency, shall be sold at public sale by the law enforcement agency making the seizure, or shall be otherwise disposed of according to law. Forfeited currency and the proceeds of the sale of forfeited property shall be distributed:
A. first, to pay reasonable expenses incurred for storage and protection of the property;
B. second, the balance shall be paid as restitution to or on behalf of victims, if any, of the crime related to the forfeiture if the defendant is convicted of that crime; and
C. third, the balance to the governing body of the seizing agency to be used to enforce narcotics law violations, drug treatment or prevention programs, or other substance abuse initiatives, except for forfeitures of property subject to forfeiture pursuant to Chapter 17 NMSA 1978, in which case the balance shall be deposited in the game protection fund.
Section 12. [NEW MATERIAL] SAFEKEEPING OF SEIZED PROPERTY PENDING DISPOSITION.--
A. Seized currency alleged to be subject to forfeiture shall be deposited with the clerk of the district court in an interest-bearing account.
B. Seized property other than currency or real property, not required by federal or state law to be destroyed, shall be:
(1) placed under seal; and
(2) removed to a place designated by the district court; or
(3) held in the custody of the seizing law enforcement agency.
C. Property shall be kept by the custodian in a manner to protect it from theft or damage and, if ordered by the district court, insured against those risks. Section 13. Section 17-2-20.1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1979, Chapter 321, Section 1, as amended) is amended to read:
"17-2-20.1. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE--PROPERTY SUBJECT.--
A. All firearms and bows and arrows may be subject to seizure and forfeiture when used as instrumentalities in the commission of the following crimes:
(1) illegal possession or transportation of big game during closed season;
(2) taking big game during closed season;
(3) attempting to take big game by the use of spotlight or artificial light; and
(4) exceeding the bag limit on any big game species during open season.
[B. Provided that no firearms or bows and arrows
shall be subject to forfeiture if the violation was without
the knowledge or consent of the owner.
C.] B. Any motor vehicle shall be subject to
seizure and forfeiture when operated in violation of the
provisions of Section 17-2-31 NMSA 1978, regarding hunting by
spotlight [In the event of seizure and forfeiture under this
subsection, the motor vehicle shall be disposed of in
accordance with the provisions of Section 17-2-20.2 NMSA 1978.
D. No conveyance is subject to forfeiture under
this section by reason of any act or omission established for
the owner to have been committed or omitted without his
knowledge or consent. A forfeiture of a conveyance encumbered
by a bona fide security interest shall be subject to the
interest of a secured party if the secured party neither had
knowledge of nor consented to the act or omission] when the
spotlighting was in connection with illegal possession of big
game or attempt to take big game.
C. Seizure and forfeiture proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Forfeiture Act."
Section 14. Section 18-6-9.3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1993, Chapter 176, Section 11) is amended to read:
"18-6-9.3. CULTURAL PROPERTY--SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF
INSTRUMENTS.--[A.] Any instrument, vehicle, tool or equipment
used or intended to be used to violate the provisions of the
Cultural Properties Act is subject to seizure and forfeiture
[except that no instrument, vehicle, tool or equipment shall
be subject to forfeiture if the violation was without the
knowledge or consent of the owner of the property subject to
forfeiture.
B. Property subject to forfeiture pursuant to the
provisions of this section may be seized by a conservation
officer, sheriff, state police officer or law enforcement
officer upon an order of the district court in the county
having jurisdiction over the offense.
C. Seizure without a court order may occur if:
(1) the seizure is incident to an arrest or a
search pursuant to a search warrant; or
(2) the enforcement officer has probable
cause to believe that the property was used or intended for
use to violate the Cultural Properties Act.
D. In the event of seizure pursuant to this
section, proceedings shall be instituted within thirty days
from the date of seizure. A proceeding brought pursuant to
this section shall be in rem. The claim shall not be filed
against the owner or any other person and shall be filed only
as a civil case.
E. Property taken or detained pursuant to the
provisions of this section shall not be subject to replevin,
but is deemed to be in the custody of the state agency
employing the enforcing officer, subject only to the orders
and decrees of the district court. When property is seized
pursuant to the Cultural Properties Act, the state agency
seizing it shall remove the property to a place designated by
the state agency for disposition in accordance with law.
F. Except as otherwise specifically provided by
law, property forfeited due to a violation of the Cultural
Properties Act shall be sold at public auction pursuant to a
court order. The proceeds of the court-ordered sale of
forfeited property are subject first to the claims, verified
by the court, of innocent persons and the legitimate rights to
restitution of actual victims of the criminal acts. Where
proceeds are derived from violations:
(1) on lands controlled by the commissioner
of public lands, one-half of the proceeds from the sale shall
accrue to the state agency of which the law enforcement
officer seizing that property is a member and one-half shall
be deposited in the cultural properties restoration fund; and
(2) on any other state lands, one-half of the
proceeds from the sale shall accrue to the state agency of
which the law enforcement officer seizing that property is a
member and one-half of the proceeds shall be deposited in the
cultural properties restoration fund] pursuant to the
provisions of the Forfeiture Act. Notwithstanding the
provisions of that act regarding the disposition of forfeited
property, when proceeds from a court-ordered sale of forfeited
property are derived from a violation of cultural property,
the proceeds from the sale shall be used for the restoration,
stabilization, protection and preservation of the cultural
property. Any proceeds remaining shall be deposited in the
general fund."
Section 15. Section 30-3-8.1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1993, Chapter 78, Section 2) is amended to read:
"30-3-8.1. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF MOTOR VEHICLE--PROCEDURE [EXCEPTION].--
A. A motor vehicle shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture when the vehicle is used or intended for use in the commission of the offense of shooting at or from a motor vehicle pursuant to Subsection B of Section 30-3-8 NMSA 1978.
B. A motor vehicle subject to seizure and
forfeiture [may be seized by a law enforcement officer:
(1) upon an order issued by the district
court having jurisdiction;
(2) without an order if the seizure is
incident to an arrest; or
(3) without an order if the seizure is
incident to a search under a valid search warrant.
C. In the event of seizure pursuant to Subsection
B of this section, proceedings under the Rules of Civil
Procedure for the District Courts and Subsection D of this
section shall be instituted promptly.
D. A motor vehicle seized under this section shall
not be subject to replevin, but is deemed to be in the custody
of the seizing law enforcement agency, subject only to the
orders and decrees of the district court. When a motor
vehicle is seized pursuant to the provisions of this section,
a law enforcement officer may remove the property to a place
designated by the district court or by the head of the
officer's agency for disposition in accordance with the law.
E. When a vehicle is forfeited pursuant to this
section, the seizing law enforcement agency shall sell the
motor vehicle at a public auction, and the proceeds, after all
costs for impoundment, forfeiture and sale are repaid, shall
be forwarded to the state treasurer for credit to the crime
victims reparation fund pursuant to Section 31-22-21 NMSA 1978
within thirty days. If the sale of the motor vehicle does not
cover the cost of impounding, forfeiting and selling the motor
vehicle, the law enforcement agency may deduct the uncovered
portion of the cost from the proceeds of the next sale.
F. No motor vehicle shall be subject to forfeiture
when the owner of the motor vehicle establishes that the
offense of shooting at or from a motor vehicle pursuant to
Subsection B of Section 30-3-8 NMSA 1978 was committed without
his knowledge or consent. A forfeiture of a motor vehicle
encumbered by a recorded bona fide security interest shall be
subject to the interest of the secured party if the secured
party did not have knowledge of or did not consent to the
offense of shooting at or from a motor vehicle pursuant to
Subsection B of Section 30-3-8 NMSA 1978] shall be seized and
forfeited pursuant to the provisions of the Forfeiture Act."
Section 16. Section 30-16B-9 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1991, Chapter 112, Section 9) is amended to read:
"30-16B-9. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE--PROCEDURE.--[A.]
Property subject to forfeiture [under] pursuant to the
Unauthorized Recording Act may be seized [by any enforcement
officer upon an order issued by the district court having
jurisdiction.
B. Seizure without such an order may be made if:
(1) the seizure is incident to an arrest or
search under a valid search warrant or an inspection under an
administrative inspection warrant;
(2) the property subject to seizure has been
the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in an
injunction or forfeiture proceeding based upon the
Unauthorized Recording Act; or
(3) the enforcement officer has probable
cause to believe that the property was used or is intended to
be used in violation of the Unauthorized Recording Act.
C. In the event of seizure pursuant to Subsection
A of this section, proceedings under Subsection D of this
section and the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District
Court shall be instituted promptly and not later than thirty
days after seizure.
D. Property taken or detained under this section
shall not be subject to replevin but is deemed to be in the
custody of the seizing police department or agency subject
only to the orders and decrees of the district court. When
property is seized under the Unauthorized Recording Act, the
enforcement officer may:
(1) place the property under seal; or
(2) remove the property to a place designated
by the court or head of the officer's department or agency for
disposition in accordance with law.
E. When property is forfeited under the
Unauthorized Recording Act, the seizing police department or
agency shall:
(1) sell that which is not required to be
destroyed by law and the proceeds shall revert to the general
fund;
(2) take custody of the property for use by
law enforcement agencies in the enforcement of the
Unauthorized Recording Act for disposition in accordance with
law; or
(3) forward property, the proceeds from the
sale of which are not required to revert to the general fund,
to the property control division of the general services
department for disposition] and forfeited pursuant to the
provisions of the Forfeiture Act."
Section 17. Section 30-19-10 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1963, Chapter 303, Section 19-10) is amended to read:
"30-19-10. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF [PRIZES AND]
EQUIPMENT.--[Any] An illegal gambling device or other
equipment [of any type] used in gambling shall be seized [by
the law enforcement officers discovering such device or
equipment, and it shall be the duty of such officers to retain
custody of the property seized until such property is disposed
of by order of the district court. Upon proper application by
the district attorney to the judge of the district court, the
judge of the district court may by proper order direct the
destruction of any gambling device, paraphernalia or equipment
of any kind or character seized by law enforcement officers]
and forfeited pursuant to the provisions of the Forfeiture
Act."
Section 18. Section 30-31-35 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1972, Chapter 84, Section 34, as amended) is amended to read:
"30-31-35. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE--PROCEDURE.--[A.]
Property subject to forfeiture and disposal [under] pursuant
to the Controlled Substances Act may be seized [by any
enforcement officer upon an order issued by the district court
having jurisdiction.
B. Seizure without such an order may be made if:
(1) the seizure is incident to an arrest or
search under a search warrant or an inspection under an
administrative inspection warrant;
(2) the property subject to seizure has been
the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in an
injunction or forfeiture proceeding based upon the Controlled
Substances Act;
(3) the enforcement officer has probable
cause to believe that the property, which is a controlled
substance, is directly or indirectly dangerous to health or
safety; or
(4) the enforcement officer has probable
cause to believe that the property was used or is intended to
be used in violation of the Controlled Substances Act.
C. In the event of seizure pursuant to Subsection
A or Subsection B of this section, proceedings under
Subsection D of this section and the Rules of Civil Procedure
for the District Courts of New Mexico shall be instituted
promptly and not later than thirty days after seizure.
D. Property taken or detained under this section
shall not be subject to replevin, but is deemed to be in the
custody of the law enforcement agency seizing it subject only
to the orders and decrees of the district court. When
property is seized under the Controlled Substances Act, the
enforcement officer may:
(1) place the property under seal;
(2) remove the property to a place designated
by the enforcement officer; or
(3) require the law enforcement agency to
take custody of the property and remove it to an appropriate
location for disposition in accordance with law.
E. When property is forfeited under the Controlled
Substances Act, the law enforcement agency seizing it shall:
(1) sell that which is not required to be
destroyed by law. The proceeds shall revert to the general
fund of the state, county or municipality as the case may be;
(2) take custody of the property for use by
law enforcement agencies in the enforcement of the Controlled
Substances Act or remove it for disposition in accordance with
law; provided that where a motor vehicle has been seized by a
municipal police department or a county sheriff's department
with its respective jurisdictional boundaries, such department
shall institute forfeiture proceedings; or
(3) in case of property seized by the state
police, forward property, the proceeds from the sale of which
are not required to revert to the general fund, to the state
police, bureau of narcotics for disposition; provided that
motor vehicles seized by the state police may be loaned to the
governor's organized crime prevention commission for use in
undercover work, the entire cost of operating such vehicles to
be borne by the governor's organized crime prevention
commission] and forfeited pursuant to the provisions of the
Forfeiture Act."
Section 19. Section 30-31A-10 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1983, Chapter 148, Section 10) is amended to read:
"30-31A-10. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE--PROCEDURE.--[A.]
Property subject to forfeiture and disposal [under] pursuant
to the Imitation Controlled Substances Act may be seized [by
any law enforcement officer upon an order issued by the
district court having jurisdiction.
B. Seizure without such an order may be made if:
(1) the seizure is incident to an arrest or
search under a search warrant; or
(2) the property subject to seizure has been
the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in an
injunction or forfeiture proceeding based upon the Imitation
Controlled Substances Act.
C. In the event of seizure pursuant to Subsection
A or B of this section, proceedings under Subsection D of this
section and the rules of civil procedure for the district
courts of New Mexico shall be instituted promptly and not
later than thirty days after seizure.
D. Property taken or detained under this section
shall not be subject to replevin but is deemed to be in the
custody of the law enforcement agency seizing it subject only
to the orders and decrees of the district court. When
property is seized under the Imitation Controlled Substances
Act, the enforcement officer may:
(1) place the property under seal;
(2) remove the property to a place designated
by the enforcement officer; or
(3) require the law enforcement agency to
take custody of the property and remove it to an appropriate
location for disposition in accordance with law.
E. When property is forfeited under the Imitation
Controlled Substances Act, the law enforcement agency seizing
it shall take custody of the property for use by law
enforcement agencies in the enforcement of the Imitation
Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances Act
and remove it for disposition in accordance with law] and
forfeited pursuant to the provisions of the Forfeiture Act."
Section 20. Section 30-42-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1980, Chapter 40, Section 4) is amended to read:
"30-42-4. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES--PENALTIES--SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE.--
A. It is unlawful for any person who has received any proceeds derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity in which the person has participated, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of the proceeds or the proceeds derived from the investment or use thereof in the acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or operation of, any enterprise. Whoever violates this subsection is guilty of a second degree felony.
B. It is unlawful for any person to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity in order to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise. Whoever violates this subsection is guilty of a second degree felony.
C. It is unlawful for any person employed by or
associated with any enterprise to conduct or participate,
directly or indirectly, in the conduct of [such] the
enterprise's affairs by engaging in a pattern of racketeering
activity. Whoever violates this subsection is guilty of a
second degree felony.
D. It is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of Subsections A through C of this section. Whoever violates this subsection is guilty of a third degree felony.
E. Whoever violates Subsection A, B, C or D of this section in addition to the prescribed penalties shall forfeit to the state of New Mexico:
(1) any interest acquired or maintained in violation of the Racketeering Act; and
(2) any interest in, security of, claim
against or property or contractual right of any kind affording
a source of influence over any enterprise [which] that he has
established, operated, controlled, conducted or participated
in the conduct of in violation of the Racketeering Act.
F. In any action brought by the state [under]
pursuant to the Racketeering Act, [the district court shall
have jurisdiction to enter such restraining orders or
prohibitions, or to take such other actions, including but not
limited to the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds,
in connection with any property or other interest subject to
forfeiture under this section, as it shall deem proper.
G. Upon conviction of a person under this section,
the court shall authorize the attorney general or the district
attorney to seize all property or other interest declared
forfeited under this section upon such terms and conditions as
the court shall deem proper, making due provision for the
rights of innocent persons. If a property right or other
interest is not exercisable or transferable for value by the
convicted person, it shall expire and shall not revert to the
convicted person] seizure and forfeiture proceedings shall be
conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Forfeiture Act."
Section 21. Section 30-45-7 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1989, Chapter 215, Section 7) is amended to read:
"30-45-7. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY.--
A. The following are subject to forfeiture:
(1) all computer property, equipment or
products of any kind [which] that have been used,
manufactured, acquired or distributed in violation of the
Computer Crimes Act;
[(2) all materials, products and equipment of
any kind which are used or intended for use in manufacturing,
using, accessing, altering, disrupting, copying, concealing,
destroying, transferring, delivering, importing or exporting
any computer property or computer service in violation of the
Computer Crimes Act;
(3)] (2) all books, records and research
products and materials involving formulas, microfilm, tapes
and data [which] that are used or intended for use in
violation of the Computer Crimes Act;
[(4) all conveyances, including aircraft,
vehicles or vessels, which are used or intended for use to
transport or in any manner to facilitate the transportation of
property described in Subsection A, B or C of this section for
the purpose of violating the Computer Crimes Act;
(5) all property, real, personal or mixed,
which has been used or intended for use, maintained or
acquired in violation of the Computer Crimes Act;] and
[(6)] (3) all money or proceeds that
constitute an instrumentality or derive from a violation of
the Computer Crimes Act.
[B. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraphs
(1) through (6) of Subsection A of this section:
(1) no conveyance used by any person as a
common carrier in the transaction of business as a common
carrier is subject to forfeiture under this section unless it
appears that the owner or other person in charge of the
conveyance is a consenting party to a violation of the
Computer Crimes Act;
(2) no conveyance, computer property,
equipment or other material is subject to forfeiture under
this section by reason of any act or omission established by
the owner to have been committed or omitted without his
knowledge or consent;
(3) a conveyance, computer property,
equipment or other material is not subject to forfeiture for a
violation of law the penalty for which is a misdemeanor or
petty misdemeanor; and
(4) a forfeiture of a conveyance, computer
property, equipment or material encumbered by a bona fide
security interest shall be subject to the interest of a
secured party if the secured party neither had knowledge of
nor consented to the act or omission.
C.] B. Property subject to seizure and forfeiture
and disposal [under] pursuant to the Computer Crimes Act may
be seized [by any law enforcement officer upon an order issued
by the district court having jurisdiction.
D. Seizure without such an order may be made if:
(1) the seizure is incident to an arrest or
search under a search warrant;
(2) the property subject to seizure had been
the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in an
injunction or forfeiture proceeding based upon the Computer
Crimes Act; or
(3) the enforcement officer has probable
cause to believe that the property, whether real, personal or
mixed, was used or intended for use, maintained or acquired in
violation of the Computer Crimes Act.
E. In the event of a seizure pursuant to
Subsection C or Subsection D of this section, a proceeding
under the Computer Crimes Act and the rules of civil procedure
for the district courts shall be instituted promptly and not
later than thirty days after seizure. The proceeding to
forfeit property under the Computer Crimes Act is against the
property and not against the owner or any other person. It is
in rem wholly and not in personam. It is a civil case and not
a criminal proceeding. The forfeiture proceeding is required,
not to complete the forfeiture, but to prove the illegal use
for which the forfeiture was suffered.
F. Except as otherwise specifically provided by
law, whenever any property is forfeited to the state by reason
of the violation of any law, the court by which the offender
is convicted shall order the sale or other disposition of the
property and the proceeds of any such sale as provided for in
this section are subject to the court making due provisions
for the rights of innocent persons and the legitimate rights
to restitution on behalf of actual victims of the criminal
acts.
G. Property taken or detained under this section
shall not be subject to replevin but is deemed to be in the
custody of the law enforcement agency seizing it, subject only
to the orders and decrees of the district court. When
property is seized under the Computer Crimes Act, the
enforcement officer may:
(1) place the property under seal;
(2) remove the property to a place designated
by the law enforcement officer or by the district court; or
(3) require the law enforcement agency to
take custody of the property and remove it to an appropriate
location for disposition in accordance with law.
H. When property is forfeited under the Computer
Crimes Act, the law enforcement agency seizing it shall:
(1) deliver custody of the property to the
information systems council attached to the general services
department. The council, based upon a plan, shall advertise
and make available the forfeited property to state agencies
and political subdivisions of the state based upon a
demonstrated need and plan of use for that property. The
information systems council shall advertise and make the
forfeited property available by bid for a minimum of one
hundred twenty days and dispose of that property within
another sixty days. All proceeds from the sale of forfeited
property shall be deposited in the general fund; or
(2) where the court orders the property to be
sold, the proceeds of the sale shall be paid into the general
fund] and forfeited pursuant to the provisions of the
Forfeiture Act."
Section 22. Section 60-7A-4.1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1985, Chapter 179, Section 1, as amended) is amended to read:
"60-7A-4.1. UNLAWFUL SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES--CRIMINAL PENALTY--SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE.--
A. It is unlawful for any person to sell or attempt to sell alcoholic beverages at any place other than a licensed premises or as otherwise provided by the Liquor Control Act.
B. Any person who violates the provisions of Subsection A of this section is guilty of a fourth degree felony.
C. Any conveyance used or intended to be used for
the purpose of unlawful sale of alcoholic beverages or money
[which] that is the fruit or instrumentality of the crime may
be seized and [upon conviction, in the discretion of the
court, be forfeited and disposed of under the procedures set
forth in Section 30-31-35 NMSA 1978] forfeited pursuant to the
provisions of the Forfeiture Act."
Section 23. REPEAL.--Sections 17-2-20.2 and 17-2-21 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1979, Chapter 321, Section 2 and Laws 1912, Chapter 85, Section 23, as amended) are repealed.
Section 24. EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the provisions of this act is July 1, 2001.