NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: | Heaton | DATE TYPED: | 2/15/00 | HB | 253/aHAFC | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Health Care Services for Senior Citizens | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Dunbar |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY00 | FY01 | FY00 | |||
See narrative | Recurring | GF |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to SB 273, SB2
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC files
Health Policy Commission
State Agency on Aging
Human Services Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Amendment
The House Appropriations and Finance Committee amendment to HB253 changes the appropriation from $2,353.0 from the general fund to $1,000.0 from the operating reserve. The appropriation is made contingent upon the human services department receiving a waiver from the United States Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) to add a prescription benefit for persons 65 and older to the state medicaid plan.
Technical Issues with HAFC amendment
Amendment 4 has a technical error. Where it reads the "services department" it should read "human services department".
Significant Issues
With the HAFC amendment, the bill tracks with the budget proposed in SB2.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS OF HAFC AMENDMENT
The bill provides a $1 million contingent appropriation from the general fund operating reserve. It is unknown whether or not the United States HCFA would approve the waiver as, according to the health policy commission (HPC) several other states have applied for such a waiver and HCFA has not yet acted on those applications. It is also unknown how quickly HCFA would respond to the request. The one million dollars in state funds would leverage an additional $2.8 million in federal funds, if the waiver is approved. This would be sufficient to cover the costs of providing the additional prescription benefit according to an analysis prepared by the HPC.
Synopsis of Bill
HB 253 appropriates $2,355.0 from the general fund to the Human Services Department to provide Medicaid coverage for persons 65 years and older whose incomes are less than100% of the federal poverty level(FPL).
Significant Issues
HB 253 targets those individuals whose income exceed the eligibility for Supplemental Security Income program (SSI) of 72.4% FPL but have income less than 100% FPL. According to the Health Policy Commission (HPC), the bill as written provides for full Medicaid coverage for approximately 7200 persons. However, analysis also considers limiting the program to prescription cost only. ( See attached documentation from the HPC)
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
GF appropriation of $2,355.0 to HSD which would translate to a total of $8,968.0 including federal funds. HSD estimates that the program costs will be $10,375.0 based on a 5% growth rate. This leaves a shortfall of $1,407.0. Additionally HSD estimates that $200.0 ($100.0 GF) would be required for start up costs and administration. HSD estimates that there is a $475.4 shortfall in GF.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to HSD 42 CFR 435.201 allows the state to optionally implement coverage on individuals age 65 and older up to 100% of FPL
HSD would be required to complete all of the tasks associated with implementation of a new program. This includes re-programming the Medicaid Management Information System, ISD-2 eligibility system, state plan amendments, training, outreach efforts, providers, and Managed Care Organizations.
Minnesota, Maine and Michigan are pursuing HCFA waivers for pharmacy benefits only for low income seniors through Medicaid .
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
According to the Health Policy Commission:
BD/prr