NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T



SPONSOR: Burpo DATE TYPED: 02/01/00 HB 157
SHORT TITLE: Risk Reserve Balances SB
ANALYST: Carrillo


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01 FY00 FY01

See Fiscal Implications

Recurring General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



General Services Department

LFC Files



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 157 proposes to repeal the risk reserve and transfer the balance to the risk fund - Surety Bond, Public Property, Workers' Compensation, Public Liability and State Unemployment Compensation. HB 157 carries an emergency clause.



Significant Issues



Funding in the risk reserves is used to pay for claims against state agencies and state universities that are handled by the Risk Management Division (RMD) of the General Services Department (GSD). All claims, particularly liability claims, are very volatile and difficult to predict. Should claims exceed the funding appropriated to the risk funds, payments are delayed which could result in increased liability (increased claim costs and associated legal representation). Currently, transferring funding from the risk reserves to the risk funds requires legislative action.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



According to GSD staff, if the funding is not available to pay claims, there could be additional costs to RMD to settle cases. If a special session of the legislature were need for access to the funding in the risk reserve, the general fund costs to the state is estimated at a minimum of $100.0.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The purpose of the risk reserve is to be used only upon specific authorization by the legislature for a specific amount to either meet: (1) obligations of the general fund that cannot be satisfied by general fund revenues, including any amounts in the operating reserve; or (2) obligations of any risk fund that cannot be met by the balance in that risk fund.



GSD comments in 1996 the general fund operating reserve was at a low level. This was accomplished by authorizing use of cash reserves from the risk funds. The operating reserve has been restored to satisfactory levels. In addition, New York financial institutions reviewing state finances have pointed out that since risk reserves are committed dollars, they are not an appropriate substitute for state cash reserves. Therefore, keeping the risk reserve in place holds no advantage for the state.



WJC/gm